Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum > Tools, Equipment & Safety > Workplace Safety

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-28-2009, 06:46 PM   #81
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks134 View Post
if i put in jumpers at the meter, then I guess I would tie in the neutral first then the hots!
I would shut off the main and remove any jumpers before splicing. Why would you chance the arc?
Raco is offline   Reply With Quote
Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE


Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Old 10-06-2009, 02:12 PM   #82
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: WA
Posts: 74
Default

Get yourself a Fluke tick tester and use it on everything once the service has been energized. The biggest lie you are going to hear is that power is off and it's safe for you to work on. Test everything.
nitro71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:50 PM   #83
Senior Member
 
JohnJ0906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 3,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitro71 View Post
Get yourself a Fluke tick tester and use it on everything once the service has been energized. The biggest lie you are going to hear is that power is off and it's safe for you to work on. Test everything.
I agree with the testing, but use a real tester, such as a DMM, don't use a tick stick.
__________________
John from Baltimore
"One day at a Time"
All responses based on the '08 NEC
It's not my fault, it's not my problem, I'm not your solution.
JohnJ0906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 02:18 AM   #84
Member
 
Briancraig81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
I think a blast from a receptacle on a circuit with a high amperage load on it might be worse than clean 120.
I once shorted out a hot meter (Briefly) once. We were working on an old house way out in the sticks, house had one of those small round meter bases (60a). Meter wasn't in (House had just been bought) and we had both legs jumped with two pieces of #12 just so we could run the sawzall and rotary hammer. Got ready to leave and instead of pulling the line side of the jumper out first I grabbed the jumper right in the middle and tried to pull it out at once. Load side pulled loose and touched the side of the meter base. I got a nice bright flash and a loud pop but that was all. I was jerking the jumper out, so it shorted and then pulled out on the line side. Other than being blind for a few seconds, I was fine.
Briancraig81 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 11:30 PM   #85
Knob and Tube Specialist
 
Puccagirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 15
Default

When I was a an apprentice a ga-zillion years ago, we had little choice but to work on live ccts (347 volt lighting) in places like stairwells or where emergency lighting could not be shut off.

I was scared of being shocked so I was very careful. Although I did short 600volts once.. (only once) but wasn't very eventful other than shutting off some lights in an elevator.

I know of an electrical engineer who opened up some old switchgear and something blew up. He was in the hospital and in treatment for a year getting skin graphs.. very scary and makes you develop a respect for electricity.
Puccagirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 10:21 PM   #86
RH1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zog View Post
Actually it is the opposite, higher voltages cause a "skin effect", so the current tracks on the surface of the skin and will not penatrate the skin and cause burning of the nervous systems and blood vessels. (Same reason hollow tubes are used for HV outdoor substations, no need for the center to exist)

Lower voltages puncture the skin and cause current to flow thorugh the circulatory and nervous systems causing internal burns and nerve damages.

Of course voltage is only 1 of 8 factors that determine the severity of an elcetric shock, but discounting all other factors, lower voltages are more dangerous than higher voltages simply due to the skin effect.
It's clear you haven't a clue what skin effect is. Skin effect has nothing to do with voltage, it is a function of frequency and it only happens at frequencies above VHF.
.
.
RH1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 10:01 AM   #87
Zog
Senior Member
 
Zog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RH1 View Post
It's clear you haven't a clue what skin effect is. Skin effect has nothing to do with voltage, it is a function of frequency and it only happens at frequencies above VHF.
.
.
There is a different type of skin effect, which is present at all frequencies in an AC system, this is refering to the increase in conductor effective resistance from the eddy currents developed in AC systems, these eddy currents (More apparant in the center of the conductor) are directly related to frequency so the effective resistance of a conductor will increase as frequency increases.

Skin effect from high voltages is a different concept and is accounted for in the design of every high voltage system
Zog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2009, 01:00 AM   #88
Senior Member
 
Toronto Sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raco View Post
What's the fault current on that outlet which is on a 15 or 20 amp breaker?

What's the fault current on your drop which is fused somewhere down the line at what current? Linemen want to step in?

100,000 amps or more?

Voltage isn't what kills us.. it's the amps and the flashes they produce.
Very few electricians get electrocuted, most get burned!
__________________
Don't fight .. Play nice!

Last edited by Toronto Sparky; 10-21-2009 at 01:04 AM.
Toronto Sparky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CEC question -- running conductors "square" with building lines Animal Other Codes and Standards 7 12-23-2008 04:53 PM
Dont miss "Worlds toughest fixes" tonight! JRent General Electrical Discussion 3 10-02-2008 11:41 AM
New Square D Homeline "old work" load center wirenut1110 Tools, Equipment and New Products 5 07-14-2008 09:09 PM
converting radio volume "dial" to buttons cduluk General Electrical Discussion 7 11-06-2007 09:10 PM
Replace "Potentiometric Null Tester" with Fluke 87 or later model? Joe O'Brien General Electrical Discussion 2 06-28-2007 11:56 AM

Top of Page | View New Posts

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Electrician Talk © 2006 - 2009 The Building Network LLC

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0