 |
07-30-2009, 10:03 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,803
|
Wondering how that works...
I guess the state department of building regulation has decided any residence undergoing any renovations will be upgraded in the smoke alarm area. I wonder, if that revelation happens after the contractor is deep into the renovation, how should the added work be priced? I mean, it might not work well for the homeowner to solicit the work from another contractor because the permit is already issued and the work is in progress, but it is also true the smokes were not part of the original scope.
Nothing particularly straightforward in bringing a place up to code for smokes, but we don't want to appear that we are overcharging.
Anybody else have this issue going on?
So, one county inspector basically told us the house smokes would have to be upgraded (interconnected in all required spaces and wired to commercial power.) Job boss (another jurisdiction said the house could use battery powered smokes. I called that jurisdiction's chief electrical inspector who confirmed, hardwired to commercial power and interconnected. Job boss called his architect who said the smokes can be hardwired or battery.
I'm wondering what is the cause of the confusion. Hard to believe two jurisdictions have it wrong and the architect has it right.
Last edited by waco; 07-31-2009 at 09:26 PM.
Reason: Update based on today's happenings
|
|
|
Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here

|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
07-31-2009, 12:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
Licensed Pro
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rahway, NJ
Posts: 2,792
|
For me, adding a smoke/ carbon monoxide detector circuit to meet NFPA-72 requirements can be found in the rehabilitation sub code. It's a shame that you didn't realize this earlier but they have to go in. I'll bet you're pretty good at snaking wires and if you're not nows the time to get some practice in.
__________________
There's only one way to succeed in anything, and that is to give it everything.
Vince Lombardi
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 08:47 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Presque Isle, Maine
Posts: 2,250
|
Normally you follow the code from the date the permit was pulled.
__________________
"Whatever is felt is within suffering."
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 08:59 AM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Beautiful Cumberland Valley, in PA
Posts: 6,942
|
Around here, they have a "50% rule". If the renovation is covering more than 50% of the dwelling or adding 50% more square feet, that triggers the interconnected smokes requirement throughout the whole dwelling. I'm pretty sure that's not written in law anywhere, but it sounds perfectly reasonable to me. The approved plans will state whether the interconnected smokes are just required in the area under renovation or through the whole house.
__________________
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 09:30 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,803
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDShunk
Around here, they have a "50% rule". If the renovation is covering more than 50% of the dwelling or adding 50% more square feet, that triggers the interconnected smokes requirement throughout the whole dwelling. I'm pretty sure that's not written in law anywhere, but it sounds perfectly reasonable to me. The approved plans will state whether the interconnected smokes are just required in the area under renovation or through the whole house.
|
Sounds reasonable enough to me. Fully upgraded smokes seems a reach for a bathroom or kitchen remodel.
We encountered it, but thought it was a local jurisdiction initiative.
The work and technique isn't the issue. The pricing and rights of the homeowner are the issue.
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 09:41 AM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Beautiful Cumberland Valley, in PA
Posts: 6,942
|
If the plans aren't actually back from plan review yet, I normally put a line in the estimate to the effect that if the inspector requires interconnected smokes through the whole house, add $X.XX to the price. I really don't like to break out prices like that, but it really helps to avoid hard feelings later on and puts the blame for the extra fee on the inspection agency. It also gives the option to do it anyhow; required or not.
__________________
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 09:41 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 428
|
In my area… add a bedroom and the entire home has to be completely updated to code with interconnected smoke alarms. CO’s on each level with habitable space as well, but for some reason, not required in unfinished areas where many CO generating heating sytems are actually located.
If more than 12 smoke alarms will be interconnected, you’re required to install a system type devices, which equates to a fire alarm panel/system. I believe there is a 40% square footage rule as well, but that may just be a local thing.
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 10:37 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 155
|
At one jurisdiction in MD a building permit triggers the need to update the smokes to todays standard. Finally a reaon to like ranch style houses.
|
|
|
07-31-2009, 10:59 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 1,426
|
As KJ pointed out,thats basically the rule.
The inspectors (fire prevention) won't spot check existing, but once the 'camels nose' is in he door..........
The CO rule has been in place since March 2006. So 'technically' If a tennant moves out,a new cert of occupancy is needed and at that time the entire place needs to be upgraded (smoke wise).
__________________
"When one American is not worth the effort to be found, we as Americans have lost" (Rolling Thunder MA 1)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|