 |
|
11-06-2009, 02:16 PM
|
#241
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 66
|
Before going into this let me state I have not done drugs in over 30 years and I do not drink both of these are by choice. Further to that statement when asked to do a drug test I tell the employer he is renting my services and as of now the tenancy is terminated.
I will also admit I have only been asked about a drug test three times and in each case it had to do with dealing with a project being lead by a company not of Canadian origion from that only one of the times by refusing did I not work. Amazing rules get thrown out the window when there are not enough people willing to go along with it.Everyone remember as with every situation the more the people allow to be done to them the more that will be done.
Many drugs are considered illegal not because the people felt they were wrong but because the government after being wooed by special interest groups made them illegal. Amazing what the beer, liquor and tobacco industry has been able to do isn’t it.
Now I am not a Union member for some strange reason I like to have my freedom and not have to bend over to others. I’m not American don’t live in the “Land of the Free” but then from the sound of it none of you do either. I believe a man comes to work drunk or stoned kick him out, but what he does on the weekend in the privacy of his own home is not the business of the employer or the Union (thought this group promoted brotherhood not big brother).
|
|
|
Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here

|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
11-06-2009, 02:48 PM
|
#242
|
|
Thread Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rewire
If you are injured on the job you will be drug tested at the hospital and if you fail you will be denied workmans comp benefits that was the new law passed in Missouri.
|
I bet there is a similar law in every state, and your right to "privacy and to do what you want on your free time" may cost you a lot if you are injured on the job and gives the insurance boys a free ride. It's a free country, do what you want but as a married man with kids, I take my risk factors very seriously.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 03:13 PM
|
#243
|
|
Master Electrician
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
|
Drug testing is just like doing a background check,illegal drug use is a crime plain and simple even when done on your own time.If you molested children on your own time and were caught I will see it on your background check and you will not be hired and if you use drugs on your own time it will show on a drug screen and you will not be hired.
Exposure to liability is a major factor for employers if you are involved in an accident and have drugs in your system then the first thing that happens is they will look at my drug testing policy and I better have one.
I spoke with my lawyer who told me if someone with a criminal history commits a crime while in my employ and I did not do a background check I can be found negligent.
I had an employee leave over our drug testing policy I hated to see him leave but it was not worth the liability he might create.As an employer I always have to look at the exposure I have to lawsuits and take steps to limit it.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders ,never forget
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 03:19 PM
|
#244
|
|
Thread Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 213
|
BINGO!!! Then after that employee drug user is turned down for workman's comp, he gets an ambulance chaser to sue you and the GC and god help you if you have any OSHA violations.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 03:54 PM
|
#245
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 66
|
To me employers in general, mandating the behavior outside the work environment or outside their business are an infringement of the employee’s rights. Plus I would like to know why someone going to lunch and having a few sociable drinks then going back to work in the office each day has the right to tell someone on the weekend he can’t smoke a joint. Just because person “A” is an executive either in the business or union and person “B” is just an employee who without person “A” might actually have to get his hands dirty again and work for a living.
As far as I am concerned you hired me for my skills. If the skills are sharp and not interfered with (on drugs or booze while working) if I show up on time if I do what I am told then you have no right to look into what I do at home. If I break the law at home that’s what some of the taxes paid out is for pay the police to do their job.
Fear of lawsuits that is something that I seem to hear from many on this forum, maybe it is time to fix the legal system so lawsuits go back to what they were intended for, helping the victim of some injustice. Or failing that shoot all the lawyers, I’m sure that the court system would start working and crime rate would go down at the same time.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:06 PM
|
#246
|
|
Master Electrician
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gardiner
To me employers in general, mandating the behavior outside the work environment or outside their business are an infringement of the employee’s rights. Plus I would like to know why someone going to lunch and having a few sociable drinks then going back to work in the office each day has the right to tell someone on the weekend he can’t smoke a joint. Just because person “A” is an executive either in the business or union and person “B” is just an employee who without person “A” might actually have to get his hands dirty again and work for a living.
As far as I am concerned you hired me for my skills. If the skills are sharp and not interfered with (on drugs or booze while working) if I show up on time if I do what I am told then you have no right to look into what I do at home. If I break the law at home that’s what some of the taxes paid out is for pay the police to do their job.
Fear of lawsuits that is something that I seem to hear from many on this forum, maybe it is time to fix the legal system so lawsuits go back to what they were intended for, helping the victim of some injustice. Or failing that shoot all the lawyers, I’m sure that the court system would start working and crime rate would go down at the same time.
|
Remember the job belongs to the employer. As long as they remain within the law an employer can require anything they like ,you have the right to refuse but you do not have a right to the job.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders ,never forget
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:08 PM
|
#247
|
|
Master Electrician
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhatElvis
BINGO!!! Then after that employee drug user is turned down for workman's comp, he gets an ambulance chaser to sue you and the GC and god help you if you have any OSHA violations.
|
Actually as long as I maintain workmans comp I cannot be sued for a work related accident that was not caused by my negligence.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders ,never forget
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:19 PM
|
#248
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ontario Canada
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnelectrician
All I can say is that I agree that people should not be coming into work under the influence of anything. But, what you want to do on your own time....is your business and yours only. I do not agree with drug testing. I think that if someone has a serious drug/alcohol problem it's going to become pretty obvious prettttty fast (seen it). Deal with it then, don't get into my personal life when I'm not the one with the problem.
|
I am down the road from you, work out of 105 and in 20 yrs have never heard of a drug test on the job here unless you do damage at the IOL refinery. Can they even ask us here in Ontario to do a drug test ?
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:19 PM
|
#249
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 66
|
I do have the right to refuse and as I said previously I have refused and I have seen enough people refuse that the employer changed their policy and dropped the test. Nice part of being in areas where jobs outnumber people.
What I am sying is the ability to dictate what a person does outside of the workplace is wrong. The employer pays for someones services x number of hours per day and x number of days per week. If the employer is paying me compensation at home then he or she can have a say in what I do "no compenstaion equals no say". After all slavery is suppose to be frowned on in most civilized countries today, and to me someone that thinks because they pay spmeone for their services they can now dictate what that person does 24/7 is a form of slavery.
As I said if the person shows up drunk or stoned then send his a** to the unemployemnt line. But if he is sober and straight "back off" its not any of your business. Are taxes pay for professionals to look after unacceptable behavour not employers or Unions.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:27 PM
|
#250
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparky105
I am down the road from you, work out of 105 and in 20 yrs have never heard of a drug test on the job here unless you do damage at the IOL refinery. Can they even ask us here in Ontario to do a drug test ?
|
I think they are allowed to ask. But I know of no Canadian based company that would ask. Why take the chance of having no one pass and not being able to complete the job.
There is a story of a company asked to send some employees (not electricians but construction related) to the States to do a job out of 267 employees only three were allowed over the boarder and when they arrived they failed the American companies drug test and had to be sent back.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:34 PM
|
#251
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: ontario Canada
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gardiner
I think they are allowed to ask. But I know of no Canadian based company that would ask. Why take the chance of having no one pass and not being able to complete the job.
There is a story of a company asked to send some employees (not electricians but construction related) to the States to do a job out of 267 employees only three were allowed over the boarder and when they arrived they failed the American companies drug test and had to be sent back. 
|
That 's the resitual alchol from our beer it stays with u longer even the near beer up here will make you fail that test.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:43 PM
|
#252
|
|
Thread Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 213
|
You are absolutely right!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rewire
Actually as long as I maintain workmans comp I cannot be sued for a work related accident that was not caused by my negligence.
|
In Texas you can. In fact you can be sued by an employee from your sub as a second tier employer...all the way down to the supplier of the sub, as long as it happens on the job site and can be connected you, there is some liability.
gardiner- Here is free unsolicited sincere advice:
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!
You can be right or you can be employed. Sure sometimes you can be both, but as the lawyers get smarter, and the insurance companies get tougher those times may become more rare.
When you are responsible for the livelihood of 50 men, and a small office staff, your perspective changes and if running a drug free environment makes you more appealing to your customers, and reduces your risks and insurance premiums then you may find yourself having to turn away pefectly good electrician who were right, but not employable. Now imagine that.
Last edited by PhatElvis; 11-06-2009 at 04:44 PM.
Reason: I sharted.
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 04:48 PM
|
#253
|
|
Master Electrician
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gardiner
I do have the right to refuse and as I said previously I have refused and I have seen enough people refuse that the employer changed their policy and dropped the test. Nice part of being in areas where jobs outnumber people.
What I am sying is the ability to dictate what a person does outside of the workplace is wrong. The employer pays for someones services x number of hours per day and x number of days per week. If the employer is paying me compensation at home then he or she can have a say in what I do "no compenstaion equals no say". After all slavery is suppose to be frowned on in most civilized countries today, and to me someone that thinks because they pay spmeone for their services they can now dictate what that person does 24/7 is a form of slavery.
As I said if the person shows up drunk or stoned then send his a** to the unemployemnt line. But if he is sober and straight "back off" its not any of your business. Are taxes pay for professionals to look after unacceptable behavour not employers or Unions.
|
If what you do on your own time impacts my business then I have every right to tell you not to engage in that activity as a condition of employement. In slavery you would have no choice but you do have a choice .
I always joke with the guys I don't want to see them on the 5 oclock news draped over a patrol car wearing a company T shirt.
This is no different than getting a speeding ticket in your private vehicle it affects my company insurance rate so I can require a clean driving record.
Drug use is just not an easy position to defend you simply make a choice between a job and drugs.I am going to keep drug users out of my workplace for the safety of others and to do that everyone gets drug tested.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders ,never forget
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 05:03 PM
|
#254
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ca
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhatElvis
In Texas you can. In fact you can be sued by an employee from your sub as a second tier employer...all the way down to the supplier of the sub, as long as it happens on the job site and can be connected you, there is some liability.
gardiner- Here is free unsolicited sincere advice:
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!
You can be right or you can be employed. Sure sometimes you can be both, but as the lawyers get smarter, and the insurance companies get tougher those times may become more rare.
When you are responsible for the livelihood of 50 men, and a small office staff, your perspective changes and if running a drug free environment makes you more appealing to your customers, and reduces your risks and insurance premiums then you may find yourself having to turn away pefectly good electrician who were right, but not employable. Now imagine that.
|
Good edit...I caught that.
__________________
Proud member of IBEW LU 340
|
|
|
11-06-2009, 05:08 PM
|
#255
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 66
|
I can see the arguement of affecting business if the drugs or alchol is done on the job or directly before or during. but what done on the weekend is not your business.
I just wonder if you were faced with the labor shortages we have seen over the past few years if you would really turn down someone or even make a drug test manitory if by doing so you knew the chance of getting enough labor to do the job might very well be impossible.
Amazing how ideals and morals in business change when money is involved.
And I still think most of this thread and opinions stated stinks of totalitarianism and fear.
|
|
|
11-07-2009, 03:40 PM
|
#256
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,006
|
Obama has told the feds and the states they will no longer pursue grow-ops and dispensaries. That state law trumps federal law in this regard. This is the first President that has clearly paved the way for legalization of marijuana. I applaud his action.
Now, what is needed is further action to legalize all drugs. All drugs including heroin and cocaine. Growing your own marijuana should be no different than the summer garden of tomatoes and peppers. This would eliminate the shady side of drug use. As said earlier, we can most likely reduce our prison populations by a significant percentage. And yes, the DEA and agencies like this go and stand in the unemployement line like everybody else.
Treat drugs just like alcohol. Same safe driving laws ect.......
And please, no drugs on the job. If you must, do it at home when you are not on call.
|
|
|
11-07-2009, 03:48 PM
|
#257
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lake Ridge, Virginia
Posts: 2,138
|
Well said John.
|
|
|
11-07-2009, 05:12 PM
|
#258
|
|
Not Banned Yet
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Near Baltimore
Posts: 805
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Valdes
...what is needed is further action to legalize all drugs. All drugs including heroin and cocaine... Treat drugs just like alcohol. Same safe driving laws ect.......
And please, no drugs on the job.
|
Just repeal the laws that were put in place for all those wrong reasons:
legalize all natural state agricultural product
medicalize all pharmaceutical product
As to employers... they can discriminate in hiring and retention for pretty much anything (outside the big 7) that they choose to *consistently* apply to all applicants and employees. Don't like it? start your own company.
__________________
Engineering. Where the noble semiskilled laborers execute the vision of those who think and dream. Hello, Oompa-Loompas of science. -Sheldon
|
|
|
11-07-2009, 06:13 PM
|
#259
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Valdes
Obama has told the feds and the states they will no longer pursue grow-ops and dispensaries. That state law trumps federal law in this regard. This is the first President that has clearly paved the way for legalization of marijuana. I applaud his action.
|
It is pretty cool in my opinion, but I wouldn't jump to conclusion that legalization of drugs will make accountability disappear if they are found in your system after an accident. As PhatElvis has said, lawyers will dig up anything possible and use it against you.
|
|
|
11-07-2009, 08:06 PM
|
#260
|
|
Master Electrician
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhatElvis
In Texas you can. In fact you can be sued by an employee from your sub as a second tier employer...all the way down to the supplier of the sub, as long as it happens on the job site and can be connected you, there is some liability.
|
Sucks to live in Texas. Workmnas comp was set up just to stop lawsuits our legislature passed it into law that if you carried workmans comp then employees had to accept what the paid and could not sue.
__________________
Patriot Guard Riders ,never forget
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|