 |
|
05-24-2011, 11:55 AM
|
#21
|
|
√-1 2³ Σ π
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter D
Basically, the rating at which it will trip. GFCI for personnel protection has a trip rating of 5mA. GFP has ratings far higher than that.
|
So a GFCI receptacle will trip if there is a fault of 5mA and a GFP will trip for example with 5A?
__________________
Do you want a good job or a fast job?
|
|
|
Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here

|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ElectricianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
05-24-2011, 11:57 AM
|
#22
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: N.E.
Posts: 16,081
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josue
So a GFCI receptacle will trip if there is a fault of 5mA and a GFP will trip for example with 5A?
|
Yeah. GFP protection is usually rated around 30 mA, which is above lethal levels. GFP for large services may be rated even higher, I'm not sure though.
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 11:58 AM
|
#23
|
|
√-1 2³ Σ π
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter D
Yeah. GFP protection is usually rated around 30 mA, which is above lethal levels. GFP for large services may be rated even higher, I'm not sure though.
|
Thanks!
__________________
Do you want a good job or a fast job?
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:02 PM
|
#24
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: N.E.
Posts: 16,081
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josue
Thanks! 
|
You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to user4818 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:08 PM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 23,915
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josue
What's the difference between a GFP and a GFCI?
|
GFCIs (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters) are intended to protect people
GFP (Ground Fault Protection) is intended to protect equipment, and the trip rating can be miliamps to 100s of amps depending on what is being protected.
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:10 PM
|
#26
|
|
√-1 2³ Σ π
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
GFCIs (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters) are intended to protect people
GFP (Ground Fault Protection) is intended to protect equipment, and the trip rating can be miliamps to 100s of amps depending on what is being protected.
|
Thanks.
So which is more sensitive, the GFP right?
__________________
Do you want a good job or a fast job?
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:12 PM
|
#27
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: N.E.
Posts: 16,081
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josue
Thanks.
So which is more sensitive, the GFP right?
|
Technically, the GFCI is far more sensitive, because it trips at a much lower.
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:15 PM
|
#28
|
|
√-1 2³ Σ π
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter D
Technically, the GFCI is far more sensitive, because it trips at a much lower.
|
ok
__________________
Do you want a good job or a fast job?
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 12:25 PM
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 23,915
|
A GFCI is required to open when the current exceeds about 6 mA, on the other hand many GFPs for services are set at 400 to 800 amps.
This is an oversimplification as time has something to do with it as well.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BBQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-24-2011, 01:12 PM
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 1,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Alwon
Why do you need GFP? If you want GFP put in a GFCI-- these are arc fault protection- you don't need GFP in those areas. Also I don't think these devices would work as set up if they had GFP.
|
Dennis,
My point is is that the GFP part of the previous AFCIs did most of the work. In talking with a AFCI decelopement engineer from Eaton, I was told that 90 to 95% of the trips are GFP trips and not arc signature recognition trips.
The AFCI arc signature recognition does not look at "series arcs" with a current of less than 5 amps. Glowing connections (a form of series arc) can produce enough heat to start a fire at well less than 5 amps. With a wiring system that includes an EGC, there will often be a ground fault before a fire starts and the GFP part of the AFCI provides that protection.
It is an even bigger part of the protection of the original branch circuit/feeder type of AFCIs as they did not even look at series arcing faults and did not look at parallel arcing fauts of less than 75 amps.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to don_resqcapt19 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-24-2011, 01:27 PM
|
#31
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 12,034
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by don_resqcapt19
Dennis,
My point is is that the GFP part of the previous AFCIs did most of the work. In talking with a AFCI decelopement engineer from Eaton, I was told that 90 to 95% of the trips are GFP trips and not arc signature recognition trips.
|
I do understand and I do not know why it is allowed if it were such a big issue. If that were a true concern then GFP should be required also but it is not so I am not sure that the GFP faults that occur are necessarily a fire hazard.
__________________
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 03:52 PM
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: IL
Posts: 1,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Alwon
I do understand and I do not know why it is allowed if it were such a big issue. If that were a true concern then GFP should be required also but it is not so I am not sure that the GFP faults that occur are necessarily a fire hazard.
|
I am not sure of that and I really don't believe too much of what the manufacturers and UL tell us about AFCIs.
These are the people that said, in the original AFCI proposals, that they had a device ready to market that would do what they now tell us the combination type AFCIs will do. Those original proposals were some 13 years before the combination type AFCI hit the market.
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 10:23 PM
|
#33
|
|
Modérateur
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NE Wi / Paris France{ In France for while }
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by don_resqcapt19
Marc,
How does a RCD work to catch a series arc? I thought that RCD was just another term for ground fault protection.
|
Don.,
I know that question will pop up on moi one way or other anyway the standard branch RCD will genrally can catch the arc series arc due the unblanced load and rapid cycling just enough to trip the RCD but for the main RCD breaker the chance to see the Main RCD breaker to trip from series arc is very small unless the branch RCD is malfunctioned.
Again., The RCD is primarly used for GFP due they are on higher ma setting and we do have 3 diffrent setting we used depending on location it being used. The main RCD typically have 100 ma while branch RCD are at 30 ma and for bathroom or pool useage they are at 6 or 10 ma setting { it depending on which manufacter we get it from }
There were few case the RCD did tripped from series arc but parallel arc ., AFAIK they don't trip unless it combined with ground fault situation arise.
Merci,
Marc
__________________
Bleu est beau.
|
|
|
05-24-2011, 11:11 PM
|
#34
|
|
Good at being Evil
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island,NY & Poconos
Posts: 11,119
|
 i always liked GE loadcenters and breakers
__________________
All these liberal laws has turned me into a right wingnut..
|
|
|
05-25-2011, 09:45 PM
|
#35
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: LOS ANGELES
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
A GFCI is required to open when the current exceeds about 6 mA, on the other hand many GFPs for services are set at 400 to 800 amps.
This is an oversimplification as time has something to do with it as well.
|
I have dumb question WHY on commercial switch gear did they start at 1000 amps for G.F.P .  Clue me in?
__________________
keep trying , never give up on your dreams...
|
|
|
05-25-2011, 09:50 PM
|
#36
|
|
1,000,000th Poster
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland
Posts: 9,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ce2two
I have dumb question WHY on commercial switch gear did they start at 1000 amps for G.F.P .  Clue me in?
|
I've seen GFP set a good bit lower than that, but a setting that high is probably for selective coordination: If there's a ground-fault in a branch circuit, you want the branch breaker to have a chance to clear it before it dumps the main. A feeder fault off of the gear is usually gonna be a heck of a lot more than 1000A so it's safe to have it set that high and still be effective.
-John
__________________
Before posting, ask yourself "How hard would I get punched if I said this in person?"
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Big John For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-25-2011, 09:52 PM
|
#37
|
|
still in business
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: middle america
Posts: 2,632
|
I know for a fact that Seimens arc-fault can only be tested with their buttons. I received an email from their tech dept. that stated this fact. I will look for it tommorow if this thread is still active.
|
|
|
05-30-2011, 12:08 AM
|
#38
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 12
|
testing AFCI?
So I was on a service call for an AFCI that kept tripping. Traded it out and it still tripped. Divided circuit in half, still tripped. Finally located a J-box in attic with  loose wirenut from previous electrician... getting toasty. Hmmm it wasn't the crummy AFCI, it was DOING exactly what it was designed to do! The homeowner was CONVINCED it was the breaker. Glad I reserved any comments until I had the answer! With that example it seems like it wouldn't be that hard to make an AFCI tester. Put in a small load device and a simulated loose wirenut-- wouldn't that work?
|
|
|
05-30-2011, 12:47 AM
|
#39
|
|
Heavily Armed Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fascistchusetts
Posts: 29,503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopenny
So I was on a service call for an AFCI that kept tripping. Traded it out and it still tripped. Divided circuit in half, still tripped. Finally located a J-box in attic with  loose wirenut from previous electrician... getting toasty. Hmmm it wasn't the crummy AFCI, it was DOING exactly what it was designed to do! The homeowner was CONVINCED it was the breaker. Glad I reserved any comments until I had the answer! With that example it seems like it wouldn't be that hard to make an AFCI tester. Put in a small load device and a simulated loose wirenut-- wouldn't that work? 
|
Good work that is the # problem poor workmanship bad splices lose device screws.......
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HARRY304E For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|