 |
04-19-2012, 11:37 PM
|
#1
|
|
Sideways Sparky
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SK Canada
Posts: 820
|
Multiple circuits extending to another buiding
Hypothetically , lets say I have a detached garage 30 feet from the house and I decide that instead of putting a panel in it, I will extend multiple circuits from the house. One for lights, one for plugs, one for openers etc...
What rules if any would prevent this?
I thought there was something about two circuits maximum, but the only thing I can find is in section 6 and I don't think it applies.
|
|
|
Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!
Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here

|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury
or death. ElectricianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
04-20-2012, 12:44 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 165
|
Nothing, usually a sub panel is more cost effective then running multiple smaller wires.
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:13 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 24,694
|
Violation under the NEC so it kind of surprises me if OK under the CEC
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:22 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
Violation under the NEC so it kind of surprises me if OK under the CEC
|
2 ckt max, and must be mwbc
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada.
Posts: 18
|
14-110(1). ?
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:48 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 24,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 360max
2 ckt max, and must be mwbc
|
That would be one circuit even if 3 phase.
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:50 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
That would be one circuit even if 3 phase.
|
was thinking residential (1phase 208)
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 02:55 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 24,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 360max
was thinking residential (1phase 208)
|
I hear ya and really I am splitting hairs here but a MWBC by NEC definition is one circuit that at times is allowed to considered two or three.
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 03:36 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
I hear ya and really I am splitting hairs here but a MWBC by NEC definition is one circuit that at times is allowed to considered two or three.
|
I automatically think residential because of the mwbc, I work industrial and commercial (never residential), and we don't use the 'shared neutral'
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 03:41 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 24,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 360max
I automatically think residential because of the mwbc, I work industrial and commercial (never residential), and we don't use the 'shared neutral'
|
I work commercial and some industrial and we use MWBCs as often as we can.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BBQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-20-2012, 03:51 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4,009
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
I work commercial and some industrial and we use MWBCs as often as we can.
|
most of it is a specs thing in NY. I worked at the new computer chip plant, the grounding was like nothing I've ever seen in my career, ever thing grounded with wire only and I mean every thing. What are you on nites in one of the stores?
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 10:23 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: AB CA
Posts: 1,504
|
360 you are the odd guy out. That means every wire in your buildings are carrying current. Wasteful bigtime! But if that's what they demand, what can you do.
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 06:56 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 137
|
I was just going to ask a question like this so I'll add to here.
At a place here, Ive seen multiple circuits ran from a main panel in one building to cabins (separate buildings). A 240v 2-wire in a conduit for heaters, and a 120v 2-wire in another conduit for lights/receptacles, to each cabin. Not sure if that's legal? I thought you were usually limited to one circuit (which could be a MWBC). Doesn't seem professional either.
And is a disconnect required at each building? They were just ran directly into the receptacle or heater.
I can't seem to find anything in the code book....
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 07:55 PM
|
#14
|
|
Sideways Sparky
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SK Canada
Posts: 820
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprdave
I was just going to ask a question like this so I'll add to here.
At a place here, Ive seen multiple circuits ran from a main panel in one building to cabins (separate buildings). A 240v 2-wire in a conduit for heaters, and a 120v 2-wire in another conduit for lights/receptacles, to each cabin. Not sure if that's legal? I thought you were usually limited to one circuit (which could be a MWBC). Doesn't seem professional either.
And is a disconnect required at each building? They were just ran directly into the receptacle or heater.
I can't seem to find anything in the code book....
|
In the past when I was but a peeon helper. We remote mounted panels for corrosive and explosive environments and ran multiple circuits from them. That seems fine in my mind but for some reason it seems different if there is no reason why a panel could not exist in the structure.
The cabin thing is exactly what I am planning to do. There is a 120 year old cabin at a resort in which there is no place to put a panel. I want to put a weatherproof service behind it and feed two circuits from there.
|
|
|
04-20-2012, 08:16 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Regina, Sask, Canada
Posts: 550
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farlsincharge
There is a 120 year old cabin at a resort in which there is no place to put a panel. I want to put a weatherproof service behind it and feed two circuits from there.
|
Not in 09 but in 2012 you can: 6-206(3). I think the inspectors will let you use 2012 if the entire installation complies with the 2012 code.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|