Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum > Electrical Trade Topics > NEC Code Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-28-2009, 01:26 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3
Default Ampacity and deratings

Hello, folks:

I must take an examination on Friday and am struggling a bit with problems pertaining to ampacities and to the proper procedure for derating ampacities. I show below a sample problem and my proposed solution. I would like to know whether or not the proposed solution is correct, and, if so, whether the underlying logic is correct. If you can help, I would be much obliged!


Problem

A 240V/120V single-phase, three-wire feeder circuit supplies a continuous load of 180 A and a non-continuous load of 100 A. Given that:

(1) the terminations for the feeder are rated for 75 degrees C,

(2) the ambient temperature is 40 degrees C,

calculate the size of THHN conductors that are required for this application. What size overcurrent protection device is required?


Proposed solution

Step #1: Calculate the true load: 180 A + 100 A = 280 A

Step #2: Adjust true load for presence of continuous load: adjusted load = 1.25 X 180 A + 100 A = 325 A

Step #3: Use result of step #2 to establish minimal size of THHN conductors:

Using 90 degree C column of Table 310.16, see that 350 kcmil THHN conductors are the smallest that have an uncorrected ampacity, 350 A, that is equal to or greater than 325 A.

Step #4: Adjust uncorrected ampacity for 40 degree C temperature

Using the 90 degree C column of Table 310.16, I see that the correct factor is 0.91.
Therefore, adjusted ampacity = 350 A X 0.91 = 318.5 A

Step #5: Compare adjusted ampacity with 75 degree ampacity of 350 kcmil conductors:

318.5 A is greater than 310 A, which is the 75 degree C ampacity of 350 kcmil conductors

Therefore use 310 A rather than 318.5 A as being the allowable ampacity of the conductors
Allowable ampacity = 310 A

Step #6: Compare allowable ampacity with true load:

310 A is greater than 280 A, so conductors will carry the load

Step #7: The conductors must be protected according to their allowable ampacity, which is 310 A. In addition the results of step #2 establishes a minimal rating for the overcurrent protection device, namely 325 A, that actually exceeds 310 A. Unfortunately 325 A does not correspond to a standard size, so we must select the next largest standard size, which is 350 A.


CONCLUSIONS: 350 KCMIL THHN CONDUCTORS SATISFY ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEC PROVIDED THAT THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE IS RATED AT 350 A.


I have a few specific questions:

(1) Is step #3 correct? Approximately 50% of my classmates insist that we must use the 75 degree column even at this early stage of the calculation because the termination devices are rated at 75 degrees C. I do not see how to justify this point of view for circuits in excess of 100 A.

(2) Is the use of the correction factor for 90 degree conductors in step #4 correct?

(3) Is the comparison with the true load in step #6 correct? I note that if the proper comparison should be with the adjusted load, then 350 kcmil conductors would not be acceptable.

If there should be anyone out there in cyberspace with the time and inclination to be of assistance I would greatly appreciate hearing from you.
pnk7285 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE


Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Old 10-28-2009, 03:39 PM   #2
Robotic Rat
 
nolabama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: new orleans la
Posts: 1,011
Default

good luck !! if you are taking the icc test your thinking about this waaay to much
__________________
the more i learn the less i know
nolabama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 03:40 PM   #3
Robotic Rat
 
nolabama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: new orleans la
Posts: 1,011
Default

wait a minute - that looks like a union exam question and not a license exam question - am i right?
__________________
the more i learn the less i know
nolabama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 03:40 PM   #4
Master Electrician
 
rewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
Default

Size your OCP device frst based on 215.3 then select your conductor using the 74C column based on the calculated load now apply your derating factors if the selected conductor after derating cannot be protected by the OCP device then select the next size wire at this point you can use the 90c table for derating.You size the OCP device then find the wire size based on 75c
rewire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 04:21 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3
Default reply to nolabama

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolabama View Post
wait a minute - that looks like a union exam question and not a license exam question - am i right?
Actually neither. This is merely a question from my textbook. I am a student at a nearby technical college. I must say, however, that your response cheers me up a bit. I'm glad to know that I won't run into too many problems like this.
pnk7285 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 04:44 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rewire View Post
Size your OCP device frst based on 215.3 then select your conductor using the 74C column based on the calculated load now apply your derating factors if the selected conductor after derating cannot be protected by the OCP device then select the next size wire at this point you can use the 90c table for derating.You size the OCP device then find the wire size based on 75c
***********

Thanks a million, Rewire. I must say that your explanation is far clearer than is either my textbook or the NEC. According to your recipe, then, the correct solution is:

step #1: OCPD = 350 A based upon next standard size above the calculated load

step #2: using 75 degree C column in conjunction with calculated load, 325 A, I observe that 400 kcmil conductors are required.

step #3: derate using the 90 degree ampacity:

allowable ampacity = 380 A X 0.91 = 345.8 A, which is substantially greater than the true load.

This conductor may, in fact, be protected by a 350 A OCPD, so the problem is solved.

The correct answer is therefore 400 kcmil, as 50% of my classmates insisted.


Thanks again for a great explanation.
pnk7285 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 05:57 PM   #7
Master Electrician
 
rewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eldon Missouri
Posts: 890
Default

welcome to the forum
rewire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ampacities, correction factors, derating

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum Ampacity Question NolaTigaBait General Electrical Discussion 54 04-16-2009 08:03 PM
cable ampacity waco General Electrical Discussion 3 03-26-2009 09:59 AM
What is the ampacity for 8 AWG wire? 50 or 40 gilamor NEC Code Forum 23 10-19-2008 10:28 PM
ampacity waco General Electrical Discussion 3 08-15-2008 06:26 PM
14 AWG allowable ampacity shocking NEC Code Forum 16 10-18-2007 10:38 PM

Top of Page | View New Posts

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Electrician Talk © 2006 - 2009 The Building Network LLC

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0