Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum > Electrical Trade Topics > NEC Code Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-23-2009, 11:40 AM   #21
Inspector
 
electures's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Great Police State of South Jersey
Posts: 42
Default See 310.15(B)(6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RICK BOYD View Post
Where in the code do I justify the size of the neutral being smaller than the hots in a service
I know why I just can't find the rule

Rick
It can be found in 310.15(B)(6) last sentence. The grounded conductor shall be permitted to be smaller than the ungrounded conductors, provided the requirements of 215.2, 220.61, and 230.42 are met.

Please note that this can only be used on 120/240-volt, 3-wire, single-phase dwelling services and feeders. This is why I will only accept SE and SER cable for non-dwelling services if the contractor provides the calculations for the grounded and ungrounded conductors. 2/0 SE/SER cable has a 1/0 grounded conductor. 2/0AL is rated 135A. 1/0 AL is rated at 120A. 4/0 SE/SER cable has a 2/0 grounded conductor. 2/0 is rated at 135A. 4/0 SE/SER cable can only be used on non-dwelling 200A services and feeders if the calculated load does not exceed 180A on the ungrounded conductors and 135A on the grounded conductor.

The only way to undersize the neutral is if the calculated load is provided, otherwise fullsize. If there is no neutral load, then the grounded service conductor is the same size as the GEC per 250.24(C) (1) and 250.66. When the table max is reached then the grounded service conductor increases to 12.5% of the ungrounded conductors.

Hope this helps!

Last edited by electures; 10-24-2009 at 04:54 PM.
electures is online now   Reply With Quote
Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE


Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Old 10-23-2009, 01:20 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: us
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by electures View Post
It can be found in 310.15(B)(6) last sentence. The grounded conductor shall be permitted to be smaller than the ungrounded conductors, provided the requirements of 215.2, 220.61, and 230.42 are met.

Please note that this can only be used on 120/240-volt, 3-wire, single-phase dwelling services and feeders. This is why I will only accept SE and SER cable for non-dwelling services if the contractor provides the calculations for the grounded and ungrounded conductors. 2/0 SE/SER cable has a 1/0 grounded conductor. 2/0AL is rated 135A. 1/0 AL is rated at 120A. 4/0 SE/SER cable has a 2/0 grounded conductor. 2/0 is rated at 135A. 4/0 SE/SER cable can only be used on non-dwelling 200A services and feeders if the calculated load does not exceed 180A on the ungrounded conductors and 135A on the grounded conductor.

The only way to undersize the neutral is if the calculated load is provided, otherwise fullsize. If there is no neutral load, then the grounded service conductor is the same size as the GEC per 250.24(C) (1) and 250.66. When the table max is reached then the grounded service conductor increases to 12.5% the ungrounded conductors.

Hope this helps!

4/0 SE/ SER cannot be used for a non dwelling 200 amp. 310.16 must be used.
mcclary's electrical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:12 PM   #23
Inspector
 
electures's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Great Police State of South Jersey
Posts: 42
Default Yes it can.., If the calculated load does not exceed 180 amperes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcclary's electrical View Post
4/0 SE/ SER cannot be used for a non dwelling 200 amp. 310.16 must be used.
230.42(A) General. The ampacity of the service-entrance conductors before the application of any adjustment or correction factors shall not be less than either (A)(1) or (A)(2). Loads shall be determined in accordance with Part III. IV, or V of article 220, as applicable. Ampacity shall be determined from 310.15. The maximum allowable current of busways shall be that value for which the busawy has been listed or labeled.

(1) The sum of the noncontinuous loads plus 125% of the continuous loads.

(2) The sum of the noncontinuous loads plus the continuous load if the service-entrance conductors terminate in an overcurrent device where both the overcurrent devcie and its assembly are listed for operation at 100% of their rating.

230.79. Rating of Service Disconnecting Means. The sevice disconnecting means shall have a rating not less that the calculated load to be carried, determined in accordance with Part III, IV, or V of Article 220, as applicable.

240.4(B) Devices rated 800 Amperes or Less. The next higher standard overcurrent device rating (above the ampacity of the conductors being protected) shall be permitted to be used, provided all of the following conditions are met:

(1) The conductors protected are not part of a multioutlet branch circuit...,

(2) The ampacity of the conductors does not correspond with the standard ampere rating of a fuse or a circuit breaker without overload trip adjuctments above its rating (but that shall be permitted to have other trip or rating adjustments).

(3) The next higher standard rating selected does not exceed 800 amperes.

If you disagree with this, please provide the code section(s)...

electures is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 08:53 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: us
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by electures View Post
230.42(A) General. The ampacity of the service-entrance conductors before the application of any adjustment or correction factors shall not be less than either (A)(1) or (A)(2). Loads shall be determined in accordance with Part III. IV, or V of article 220, as applicable. Ampacity shall be determined from 310.15. The maximum allowable current of busways shall be that value for which the busawy has been listed or labeled.

(1) The sum of the noncontinuous loads plus 125% of the continuous loads.

(2) The sum of the noncontinuous loads plus the continuous load if the service-entrance conductors terminate in an overcurrent device where both the overcurrent devcie and its assembly are listed for operation at 100% of their rating.

230.79. Rating of Service Disconnecting Means. The sevice disconnecting means shall have a rating not less that the calculated load to be carried, determined in accordance with Part III, IV, or V of Article 220, as applicable.

240.4(B) Devices rated 800 Amperes or Less. The next higher standard overcurrent device rating (above the ampacity of the conductors being protected) shall be permitted to be used, provided all of the following conditions are met:

(1) The conductors protected are not part of a multioutlet branch circuit...,

(2) The ampacity of the conductors does not correspond with the standard ampere rating of a fuse or a circuit breaker without overload trip adjuctments above its rating (but that shall be permitted to have other trip or rating adjustments).

(3) The next higher standard rating selected does not exceed 800 amperes.

If you disagree with this, please provide the code section(s)...


I agree, But when I said a 200,,I meant a true 200
mcclary's electrical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 11:09 PM   #25
Rodentia Rattus
 
BuzzKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toronto Sparky View Post
I've seen a lot of jobs lately that they spec a larger (or even doubled up) neutral for feeders.
Guess that's a harmonics thing.
BuzzKill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEC version of CEC code rule.... Jeff000 General Electrical Discussion 6 01-27-2009 12:35 AM
Is there a "rule of thumb" for going to a 480V service instead of a 208V? bbaumer General Electrical Discussion 6 04-05-2008 12:12 PM
6 disconnect rule... oops! MDShunk Services and Service Equipment 14 10-23-2007 05:35 PM
AFCI rule in 2008 NEC, 210.12(B) Joe Tedesco NEC Code Forum 52 08-30-2007 11:24 AM
80' Tap Rule brian john NEC Code Forum 3 04-08-2007 06:59 PM

Top of Page | View New Posts

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Electrician Talk © 2006 - 2009 The Building Network LLC

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0