Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum
CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!
Go Back   Electrician Talk - Professional Electrical Contractors Forum > Electrical Trade Topics > NEC Code Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-20-2009, 07:59 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 64
Default Service Question

I ran into a situation several years ago in which a garage was fed from the house by an overhead service. The previous contractor had used Standard #6 triplex (ACSR messenger) so, no EGC was run between the two buildings. The neutral and ground in the garage panel were then bonded and a single rod was driven. This new electrode was not tied to the house's original grounding electrode. My first thought was that a diffrence in potential would arise. What do you guys think of this situation, how could it be improved overall?
Thayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Join Contractor Talk

Join the #1 Electrician Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

ElectricianTalk.com - Are you a Professional Electrical Contractor? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's the leading place for electricians to meet online. No homeowners asking DIY questions. Just fellow tradesmen who enjoy talking about their business, their trade, and anything else that comes up. No matter what your specialty is you'll find that ElectricianTalk.com is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally free!

Join ElectricianTalk.com - Click Here JOIN FOR FREE


Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. ElectrcianTalk.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any construction or remodeling task!
Old 11-20-2009, 09:32 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
sparks134's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 586
Default

I gotta look that one up!!! Just hit 400 posts, yeah!!!
__________________
Its not just a job, it's a career!!!
sparks134 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 10:35 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, Ga/Hamilton, Al
Posts: 2,035
Default

That was previously legal prior to the 2008 code, if certain conditions are met. No other metallic paths, such as water lines or low voltage cables, can exist between the buildings. And yes, some difference of potential could exist between the two electrodes, but how would one find themselves in contact with both at the same time?
InPhase277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 11:30 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 64
Default

I couldn't find a reference in the NEC regarding this situation. There is both a gas line and a bonded telephone cable running between the two buildings. I was originally hired to install the telephone cable between the two , so I know that it is bonded at both ends via the metallic shield. I noticed the power situation later.

Last edited by Thayer; 11-20-2009 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Clarity
Thayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 11:32 AM   #5
Licensed Journeyman
 
nolabama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: third world
Posts: 1,612
Default

Cant sleep at night over this one. I would not worry about it. But then again I am a rat hack.
__________________
“Dammit, Smithers, this isn’t rocket science, it’s brain surgery!”
nolabama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 11:39 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
sparks134's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 586
Default

they should change that code back, its a stupid code violation! im gonna make a code proposal next time!!!
__________________
Its not just a job, it's a career!!!
sparks134 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 08:18 PM   #7
Licensed Pro
 
Magnettica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rahway, NJ
Posts: 2,755
Send a message via Yahoo to Magnettica
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thayer View Post
I couldn't find a reference in the NEC regarding this situation. There is both a gas line and a bonded telephone cable running between the two buildings. I was originally hired to install the telephone cable between the two , so I know that it is bonded at both ends via the metallic shield. I noticed the power situation later.
Grounding and Bonding, Article 250, section 250.32.

250.32 (B)(2)

Grounded Conductor. Where (1) an equipment
grounding conductor is not run with the supply to the build-
ing or structure, (2) there are no continuous metallic paths
bonded to the grounding system in each building or struc-
ture involved, and (3) ground-fault protection of equipment
has not been installed on the supply side of the feeder(s),
the grounded conductor run with the supply to the building
or structure shall be connected to the building or structure
disconnecting means and to the grounding electrode(s) and
shall be used for grounding or bonding of equipment, struc-
tures, or frames required to be grounded or bonded. The
size of the grounded conductor shall not be smaller than the
larger of either of the following:
(1) That required by 220.61
(2) That required by 250.122


__________________
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
Henry Ford
Magnettica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 09:09 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 64
Default

Somehow I missed that during my brief look. That pretty well sums up the situation.
Thayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 09:59 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
JohnJ0906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 3,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thayer View Post
I ran into a situation several years ago in which a garage was fed from the house by an overhead service. The previous contractor had used Standard #6 triplex (ACSR messenger) so, no EGC was run between the two buildings. The neutral and ground in the garage panel were then bonded and a single rod was driven. This new electrode was not tied to the house's original grounding electrode. My first thought was that a diffrence in potential would arise. What do you guys think of this situation, how could it be improved overall?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thayer View Post
I couldn't find a reference in the NEC regarding this situation. There is both a gas line and a bonded telephone cable running between the two buildings. I was originally hired to install the telephone cable between the two , so I know that it is bonded at both ends via the metallic shield. I noticed the power situation later.
With the other metallic paths between the buildings, that is a violation.
Needs an EGC installed to the garage, and the neutrals/EGCs separated at the garage.
The electrodes do not need to be tied together. (Although they already are, indirectly)
__________________
John from Baltimore
"One day at a Time"
All responses based on the '08 NEC
It's not my fault, it's not my problem, I'm not your solution.
JohnJ0906 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 10:31 AM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 64
Default

Thanks everyone!
Thayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 02:35 PM   #11
Licensed Pro
 
Magnettica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rahway, NJ
Posts: 2,755
Send a message via Yahoo to Magnettica
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thayer View Post
Somehow I missed that during my brief look. That pretty well sums up the situation.
That's what we're here for.
__________________
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
Henry Ford
Magnettica is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
residential service question BuzzKill General Electrical Discussion 14 01-08-2009 09:25 PM
Service line question... Todd-sta General Electrical Discussion 4 11-08-2008 01:11 PM
150 amp residential service question BuzzKill General Electrical Discussion 2 10-27-2008 08:30 PM
Residential Service Question tahoewire Services and Service Equipment 8 01-13-2008 10:49 AM
Anudder service calculation question? agoolay General Electrical Discussion 1 04-18-2007 04:44 PM

Top of Page | View New Posts

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM.


Electrician Talk © 2006 - 2009 The Building Network LLC

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0