Get an amp clamp, plug in a load of known and consistent current draw on it (or something that regularly pulsates; I think a few guys here mentioned a pulsing light bulb recently) and then measure the neutral current until you find the appropriate conductor.
3 Phase Neutral
I have seen different types of work done by different electricians. I've seen shared neutral in a panel where the neutral is identified with numbers on the neutral bar. I also see neutral being tape to the hot conductor an inch of coming into the panel with electrical tape to identify the neutral belonging to those circuits. My question is, if none of method is available on the neutral, how do I ID the neutral? I know the code said that on a share neutral the circuits have to simultaneously trip all the circuit that is sharing the neutral. Like a 3 pole breaker, but in reality that is not the case. There's people pulling circuit 1, 3 and then 1,3,11 with the same neutral.
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
They're doing that because they're hacks. Electrically it works but ethically not.I have seen different types of work done by different electricians. I've seen shared neutral in a panel where the neutral is identified with numbers on the neutral bar. I also see neutral being tape to the hot conductor an inch of coming into the panel with electrical tape to identify the neutral belonging to those circuits. My question is, if none of method is available on the neutral, how do I ID the neutral? I know the code said that on a share neutral the circuits have to simultaneously trip all the circuit that is sharing the neutral. Like a 3 pole breaker, but in reality that is not the case. There's people pulling circuit 1, 3 and then 1,3,11 with the same neutral.
There's nothing hack about it. Read 210.4(D) and it's exception. It doesn't say anywhere that the circuits in a raceway need to be landed in numerical order. Any halfway decent electrician should know how to determine how a mwbc is fedChrisibew440 said:They're doing that because they're hacks. Electrically it works but ethically not.
It looks like you did not read his post.There's nothing hack about it. Read 210.4(D) and it's exception. It doesn't say anywhere that the circuits in a raceway need to be landed in numerical order. Any halfway decent electrician should know how to determine how a mwbc is fed
Maybe I didn't. I thought someone was bitching about sharing a neutral between 1-3-11 instead of 1-3-5.BBQ said:It looks like you did not read his post.
I used to do that all the time, but that is now an NEC violtion which IMO sucks but to ignore it is the rules is hack work.Maybe I didn't. I thought someone was bitching about sharing a neutral between 1-3-11
There's nothing hack about it. Read 210.4(D) and it's exception. It doesn't say anywhere that the circuits in a raceway need to be landed in numerical order. Any halfway decent electrician should know how to determine how a mwbc is fed[/
If you got your hands in something that you think is dead and that neutral still has potential on it. That sucks. You might as well not land the wires on the breakers in the correct order.
I was. That's ridiculous.Maybe I didn't. I thought someone was bitching about sharing a neutral between 1-3-11 instead of 1-3-5.
Nothing ridiculous about it at all. We did that for years until the NEC decided to dumb things down for the unskilled by requiring handle ties on multiwire branch circuits.I was. That's ridiculous.
Why's it a skill thing. Lmao. How stupid. To me it's a safety thing. That's most likely why the nec made its changes.Nothing ridiculous about it at all. We did that for years until the NEC decided to dumb things down for the unskilled by requiring handle ties on multiwire branch circuits.
Safetys why they manufacture afcis . On the phone cant roll eyesChrisibew440 said:Why's it a skill thing. Lmao. How stupid. To me it's a safety thing. That's most likely why the nec made its changes.
I wired single pole breakers for three phase circuits for years to but never would I share 1,3,11. Because people do things like this is why the nec is requiring mwbc's to be simultaneously disconnected.
You do know that arcs cause fires as well right? Afcis monitor the sine wave differently.Safetys why they manufacture afcis . On the phone cant roll eyes
No i had no ideaChrisibew440 said:You do know that arcs cause fires as well right? Afcis monitor the sine wave differently.
You're both right. It's a safety issue for the unskilledChrisibew440 said:Why's it a skill thing. Lmao. How stupid. To me it's a safety thing. That's most likely why the nec made its changes.
Are you f&[email protected] with meNo i had no idea
That's funny. Good one.You're both right. It's a safety issue for the unskilled
:laughing:Why's it a skill thing. Lmao.
Only an idiot opens a neutral without making sure there is no current on it.
A skilled person can do that safely
I am sorry MWBCs are above your skill level. :whistling2:How stupid. To me it's a safety thing.
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Electrician Talk
A forum community dedicated to professional electricians, contractors, and apprentices for residential and commercial work. Come join the discussion about trade knowledge, tools, certifications, wiring, builds, scales, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Top Contributors this Month
View All
macmikeman
251 Replies
Wardenclyffe
250 Replies
acro
227 Replies
Recommended Communities
