Joined
·
3,353 Posts
A 480v ungrounded system might show less than 150v to ground.It's the same both ways.
Test that receptacle to ground and you will get less than 150v. The nominal voltage will also be less than 150V.
A 480v ungrounded system might show less than 150v to ground.It's the same both ways.
Test that receptacle to ground and you will get less than 150v. The nominal voltage will also be less than 150V.
Then you wouldn't need GFCI protection.A 480v ungrounded system might show less than 150v to ground.
I’m not picking anything apart, I’m only commenting on what it says.Then you wouldn't need GFCI protection.
You know the meaning, there is no question. I think this is silly.
If you want to pick something apart for the sake of picking something apart, there is far better code articles to do it with.
You are most certainly picking it apart. It's very clear, there is no question.I’m not picking anything apart, I’m only commenting on what it says.
I don't know what that means.Using your logic , you’re could spend thousands of dollars on gfcis in a Restaurant
I don't know what this means either.I’m only saying that the wording says it’s not provided.
It’s very clear, i read it like it says.You are most certainly picking it apart. It's very clear, there is no question.
I don't know what that means.
I don't know what this means either.
Mike are you sure it has gfci and not gfp built in. If they are both GFCI then there should be no reason for trouble however if there is gfp in the unit and then you install a gfci then I can see a possibility of an issue since they trip at different limitsThe problem is that every brand of EV charger (EVSE) that I install, both hard-wired and plug-in models, has GFCI built in. Over a number of experiments so far, when plugged into a circuit protected by a (pricey) GFCI breaker, they do not function. They REQUIRE NO GFCI.
So now what???
View attachment 138400
I didn't add anything to it.It’s very clear, i read it like it says.
You read it by adding circuit to the wording, which it doesn’t, that clearly changes the requirement.
I agree that we all know what the intent is.I didn't add anything to it.
You can pick apart at least a third of the code to find little, tiny, minuscule ways to say how it's not exact int he same way as you are doing here, but we all know exactly what it means, like we do here.
The CMP has HUNDREDS of other code articles that needs to be addressed first. Code that actually makes us do different installations in different municipalities because the AHJ's see the code completely differently than each other.The CMP does as well and have changed it to read that.
The only person who doesn't know what it means is someone who is picking it apart.Apparently not,lol.
Slightly out of context here but if the recept. was fed by the high leg of a 120/240 3Ø 4 wire ∆ system and one of the other phases, it'd be more than 150 volts to ground.As a receptacle rated 250V single phase, that means that it is rated under 150V to ground.
And then you wouldn't have to GFCI protect it. You also wouldn't have to GFCI protect it if the customer says they are going to plug their RV into it.Slightly out of context here but if the recept. was fed by the high leg of a 120/240 3Ø 4 wire ∆ system and one of the other phases, it'd be more than 150 volts to ground.
Well you would have to gfci protect it in 2020 which is what the op was talking about.And then you wouldn't have to GFCI protect it. You also wouldn't have to GFCI protect it if the customer says they are going to plug their RV into it.
210.8(A) Dwelling Units.
All 125-volt through 250-volt receptacles installed in the locations specified in 210.8(A)(1) through (A)(11) and supplied by single-phase branch circuits rated 150 volts or less to ground shall have ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel.
210.8(B) Other Than Dwelling Units.
All 125-volt through 250-volt receptacles supplied by single-phase branch circuits rated 150 volts or less to ground, 50 amperes or less, and all receptacles supplied by three-phase branch circuits rated 150 volts or less to ground, 100 amperes or less, installed in the locations specified in 210.8(B)(1) through (B)(12) shall have ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection for personnel.
Mike are you sure it has gfci and not gfp built in. If they are both GFCI then there should be no reason for trouble however if there is gfp in the unit and then you install a gfci then I can see a possibility of an issue since they trip at different limits
Looks like we are all installing nema 14-50 RV outlets now. More importantly, when was the last time any of us have pulled a permit :no: to install an EV outlet? How soon before they eliminate the neutral bus terminals in Resi loadcenters?
You also wouldn't have to GFCI protect it if the customer says they are going to plug their RV into it.
If you are providing the charger, why are you using the plug-in models? The only time I install those is when the customer already bought it that way. Most customers buy the hardwired model and when they ask me beforehand that is what I recommend as well.I can't legally do this, as EVSE is almost all we do, and I often include the hardware with the sale, and usually/always hang it on the wall, plug it in, activate it, etc. I also specify in our agreements that our work is code compliant. What the customer :wink: "says" won't fly.