I just buy a new truck when that happens.
I think unless you use a high grade commercial panel, all main breakers are crap after 45 years. It all depends on the environment. Damp basement or garage. Water dripping into panel. Heat from the boiler. I look at all the new main breaker panels and question the QC of them.Those main breakers are junk, they are notorious for going bad. Last time I seen that exact breaker was in a Crouse Hinds panel that the bus bar was burning up. I think I seen it in an old Murray panel as well.
Back in the day (80's and 90's) I always carried two of those in my truck. A 150A and 200A. Seems like they always failed after hours.Those main breakers are junk, they are notorious for going bad. Last time I seen that exact breaker was in a Crouse Hinds panel that the bus bar was burning up. I think I seen it in an old Murray panel as well.
That is a nice way of looking at it. The guy was aware of the 14 guage wire and made an attempt at safety.Well, at least the original electrician fused it. Maybe he was going to return later with a breaker, but something happened to him....family incident?, accident?, health incident? I try to give people the "benefit of the doubt". I know if I did that, my intention would be to return with a suitable breaker.
Well, at least the original electrician fused it. Maybe he was going to return later with a breaker, but something happened to him....family incident?, accident?, health incident? I try to give people the "benefit of the doubt". I know if I did that, my intention would be to return with a suitable breaker.
Is it code compliant? Maybe not because the lampholder isn't listed for the use. It doesn't seem particularly hazardous to me.That is a nice way of looking at it. The guy was aware of the 14 guage wire and made an attempt at safety.
240.10 SUPPLEMENTARY OVERCUURENT PROTECTIONIs it code compliant? Maybe not because the lampholder isn't listed for the use. It doesn't seem particularly hazardous to me.
If he used an inline fuseholder and a 15A cartridge fuse, would that be compliant? Maybe it's not compliant to leave that dangling in the panel.
How about if he nippled a handy box onto the side of the panel and used one of these, Bussman SOU?
View attachment 176731
Here's the article240.10 SUPPLEMENTARY OVERCUURENT PROTECTION
Says nope. That fuse and subsequent lower ampaciity wire is a code violation.
Is this necessarily supplemental overcurrent protection? Couldn't you say that #12 is a feeder, and the handy box is a one circuit fuse panel?240.10 Supplementary Overcurrent Protection. Where supplementary overcurrent protection is used for luminaires, appliances, and other equipment or for internal circuits and components of equipment, it shall not be used as a substitute for required branch-circuit overcurrent devices or in place of the required branch-circuit protection. Supplementary over‐ current devices shall not be required to be readily accessible.
I suppose you could....... If your name was Eaton General Electric Siemans of the Square D family then possibly you could..........Here's the article
Is this necessarily supplemental overcurrent protection? Couldn't you say that #12 is a feeder, and the handy box is a one circuit fuse panel?